Students' reflection

​

"I’m very grateful to the Department of Philosophy for organizing this visit to M+. This visit has provided me with significant opportunities for reflection. The creation of art is intrinsically tied to the political and economic contexts of its time. By examining artworks from different historical periods and regions, one can uncover valuable insights into the socio-political and economic conditions of the artist. Art might serve as a form of resistance to the politics of its time, or it might reflect how economic conditions influence artistic thinking and conditions. Architecture is the most obvious example of this relationship. Architectural styles vary significantly depending on the economic conditions: periods of prosperity often result in grand, elaborate designs, whereas periods of economic austerity tend to yield more conservative and restrained structures. Interestingly, even the same architect may adopt differing design approaches depending on the economic cycles and pressures of their time, further demonstrating the interplay between the economy and artistic conditions."

​

"I was delighted to participate in this visit to the M+ museum. The artworks on display at M+ illustrate the diverse ways in which artists from various countries and regions embed their reflections and thoughts into their creations. Many of these works implicitly express the artists' viewpoints, many of which reflect their political stances. Art, therefore, can be understood as a medium of resistance, where works that challenge the status quo frequently gain broader recognition and appreciation. This dynamic underscores the role of artists and their creations not only as cultural artefacts but also as agents of social progress, helping to shape and advance the intellectual and ideological discourse of their time. However, this raises questions about the accessibility of art and its production. Historically, art has often been associated with privilege, with the majority of celebrated works emerging from elite social groups. The relative absence of contributions from marginalized or impoverished artists suggests a potential inequality in the field of art itself. Does this socioeconomic disparity in artistic production limit the inclusivity of artistic expression, and does it perpetuate structural inequities within the realm of art? These are important questions that need further exploration. This visit to M+ has provided me with new perspectives. It has deepened my understanding of the complex interrelations between art and society, and has prompted me to consider the broader implications of such dynamics."